Skip to content
Spectra Forensics, Investigation Specialist

Case study · Disputes

Stock That Existed Only on Paper

A borrower inflated stock statements and booked circular sales among related firms to draw working capital, then moved the money into promoter property.

  • Loan & credit fraud
  • Fund siphoning & round-tripping
  • Financial statement manipulation
  • Sham counterparties & fictitious transactions
exposure reviewed
₹120–150 Crexposure reviewed
shortfall in reported stock
~70%shortfall in reported stock
traced to related entities
₹60–80 Crtraced to related entities
proceedings supported
Recoveryproceedings supported

01The situation

The warehouses were full on paper and half-empty on the ground.

A consortium had financed a commodity processor against stock and receivables. Drawing power rose quickly, then the account slipped. The lenders needed to know whether this was business stress or diversion.

How it came to us

The account turned irregular soon after a sharp rise in drawing power, and the lead bank commissioned a forensic audit.

02How it worked

  1. 01Monthly stock statements overstated inventory, lifting drawing power.
  2. 02Sales and purchases were booked in a circle among related firms to inflate turnover and receivables.
  3. 03Funds drawn were moved to related entities as advances for purchases that never arrived.
  4. 04The money was used for promoter real-estate projects and to service other borrowings.
  5. 05Stock audits relied on records supplied by the borrower.
How the scheme workedAnonymised
Lender consortiumBorrower(inflated stock)Related firms(circular trades)'Advances' forundelivered goodsPromoterreal estatedrawing powersales & purchasescircular

Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram.

  • The organisation
  • Insiders involved
  • Outside parties
  • Channels & documents
  • Where the money ended up
  • Repeats / feeds back

How it was hidden

Related firms with different names and common control, circular trades that netted to zero, and stock audits that sampled documents rather than goods.

03The challenge

Reconcile reported stock and sales to reality, trace where the money went, and produce findings that could stand up in recovery proceedings.

What made it hard

  • Four years and multiple bank accounts
  • A web of related firms
  • Commodity stock that is hard to verify after the fact
  • Findings needed for legal recovery

Red flags that were there to see

  • Drawing power rising faster than business
  • Large advances to related suppliers
  • Receivables from a small group of linked buyers
  • Stock audits relying on borrower records

04Our approach

  1. Workstream 01

    Stock reconciliation

    Reported stock against purchases, production, sales and physical evidence.

  2. Workstream 02

    Related-party and circular-trade analysis

    Identified common control and trades that went round in a circle.

  3. Workstream 03

    End-use of funds

    Traced drawings to their final use.

  4. Workstream 04

    Corporate records and OSINT

    Mapped the promoter group's entities.

  5. Workstream 05

    Evidence documentation

    Findings structured for recovery proceedings.

The breakthrough

Reconciling stock statements with purchases, production and dispatches showed reported inventory could not have existed, and end-use tracing followed drawn funds through related firms into promoter real estate.

05What we found & did

  • Stock statements overstated inventory over several quarters.
  • Circular trading among related firms inflated turnover and receivables.
  • Diversion of working-capital funds to related entities and promoter property.
  • Accounts were dressed up ahead of limit renewals.
  • No collusion by bank officials was found.
Stock: reported vs reconstructed (indexed)
Reported
100
Reconstructed
30

Illustrative

06The impact

The consortium used the findings to classify the account, initiate recovery and enforcement against identified assets, and tighten stock audit standards for similar borrowers.

exposure reviewed
₹120–150 Crexposure reviewed
shortfall in reported stock
~70%shortfall in reported stock
traced to related entities
₹60–80 Crtraced to related entities
proceedings supported
Recoveryproceedings supported

07Lessons for your business

The controls that would have stopped this, or caught it sooner:

  • Verify stock physically and against movement, not documents alone.
  • Map borrowers' related parties before sanction and at renewal.
  • Watch drawing power that rises faster than sales.
  • Track end-use for advances to suppliers.

Confidential consultation

Facing challenges at work? Speak to us, and we can help you uncover the truth.

Every matter is different. Tell us what is happening and a senior expert will advise on next steps, in strict confidence.

Confidential enquiry