Skip to content
Spectra Forensics, Investigation Specialist

Case study · Disputes

Zero Skin in the Game

An investor funded a road-construction contractor. Within months, the founder's own contribution had quietly gone to zero and the diversion had begun.

  • Fund siphoning & round-tripping
  • Proxy, front & related-party vendors
  • Kickbacks
  • Undisclosed conflict of interest
  • Disproportionate assets & unexplained wealth
  • Cash & petty-cash misappropriation
diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
US$4.7M+diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
investor funds under review
US$24–35Minvestor funds under review
family net worth over four years
negligible → ₹50 Cr+family net worth over four years
diversion vehicles unpicked
4diversion vehicles unpicked

01The situation

The investor put in the capital. The founder took his out, then kept going.

A strategic investor had committed substantial capital, through debt and equity, to a road-construction contractor. Soon after, the founder's personal circumstances changed visibly: luxury cars, a large home, overseas education for family. The investor, a minority shareholder without day-to-day control, asked us to trace where its money had gone.

How it came to us

After funding, the investor noticed transfers to the founder and his firm, and the founder's lifestyle changed sharply.

02How it worked

  1. 01The founder put in small seed advances, then withdrew them using the new shareholders' money, ending with a large stake at almost no net cost.
  2. 02A third-party bridge loan raised for an urgent material purchase was moved to his own account the same day and paid out to an individual. The lender was later repaid from investor funds.
  3. 03Recurring material-purchase payments were booked to the founder himself and then to his sole proprietorship, with little actually bought.
  4. 04Company loans to his partnership firm and to a contractor came straight back to his personal account the same day.
  5. 05The largest leg: security deposits paid to a genuine project sub-contractor were passed on the same day to his firm and then to him. Matching interest on the deposit was paid back in a circle to make the deposits look real.
  6. 06Some funds re-entered the company as director's advances, creating a liability he could draw on again. The proceeds went into property, investments, family transfers, cars and education.
How the scheme workedAnonymised
InvestorEPC companySub-contractor'security deposits'Partnership firm& contractor loansFounder'sproprietorshipFounder & familyProperty · funds ·cars · educationcapital & loansdepositsloans'material purchases'same daysame dayend use'interest' loop

Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram.

  • The organisation
  • Outside parties
  • Insiders involved
  • Where the money ended up
  • Repeats / feeds back

How it was hidden

Money cycled among four vehicles. Deposit and interest entries looked commercially normal. A self-created director-loan balance masked withdrawals, transfers ran through several hops on the same day, and the firm's account was closed soon after. The same auditor and tax preparer served both the founder and the company.

03The challenge

Reconstruct four and a half years of company and personal money movements, much of it manual, without access to the founder's devices or his private firm's books, and separate genuine business payments from disguised withdrawals.

What made it hard

  • 4.5 years of records, partly manual
  • No access to the founder's devices or private books
  • Multiple entities and family members
  • Probable cash component in property deals

Red flags that were there to see

  • Material purchases paid to a director
  • Founder's stake with no net contribution
  • Same-day matched inflows and outflows
  • Deposits to a vendor larger than its business
  • Inter-corporate deposits to stressed related parties
  • Lifestyle jump against declared income

04Our approach

  1. Workstream 01

    Records digitisation

    Converted manual and fragmented records into an analysable ledger.

  2. Workstream 02

    Funds-flow reconstruction

    Traced company payments through every connected entity to final use.

  3. Workstream 03

    Personal wealth analysis

    Built a year-by-year view of the family's declared income against assets acquired.

  4. Workstream 04

    Corporate and property records

    Mapped entities, signatories and property holdings.

  5. Workstream 05

    Market intelligence

    Discreet enquiries on property values and related-party dealings.

  6. Workstream 06

    Interviews

    Put specific transactions to the people involved.

The breakthrough

Funds-flow reconstruction showed the 'security deposits' were routed back to the founder, with circular interest entries used to make them look genuine. The sub-contractor's own dealings were separated into genuine business and pass-through flows, and the founder later admitted a related kickback.

05What we found & did

  • Seed capital was withdrawn, leaving no net founder contribution.
  • A bridge loan was diverted on the day it was received.
  • Material-purchase and loan payments were recycled to the founder.
  • Security deposits to a sub-contractor were routed back to the founder.
  • A kickback for steering inter-corporate deposits was received and admitted.
  • Evidence pointed to company business being diverted to the founder's own firm.
  • The sub-contractor's other dealings were confirmed as genuine business.
Family declared net worth, start vs end of period
Year 1
US$18K
Year 4
US$5.9M

Lower bound of the end-of-period range

06The impact

The investor received a quantified, transaction-level account of the diversion and a map of the assets it funded, giving it the basis for negotiation and legal recourse as a minority shareholder.

diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
US$4.7M+diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
investor funds under review
US$24–35Minvestor funds under review
family net worth over four years
negligible → ₹50 Cr+family net worth over four years
diversion vehicles unpicked
4diversion vehicles unpicked

07Lessons for your business

The controls that would have stopped this, or caught it sooner:

  • Investor nominees should oversee how funds are deployed, not only board minutes.
  • Prohibit payments to directors as suppliers.
  • Bar auditors from personal engagements with promoters.
  • Require board approval and related-party screening for inter-corporate deposits.
  • Monitor same-day round trips and director advance balances.

Confidential consultation

Facing challenges at work? Speak to us, and we can help you uncover the truth.

Every matter is different. Tell us what is happening and a senior expert will advise on next steps, in strict confidence.

Confidential enquiry