Case study · Disputes
Zero Skin in the Game
An investor funded a road-construction contractor. Within months, the founder's own contribution had quietly gone to zero and the diversion had begun.
- Fund siphoning & round-tripping
- Proxy, front & related-party vendors
- Kickbacks
- Undisclosed conflict of interest
- Disproportionate assets & unexplained wealth
- Cash & petty-cash misappropriation
- diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
- US$4.7M+diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
- investor funds under review
- US$24–35Minvestor funds under review
- family net worth over four years
- negligible → ₹50 Cr+family net worth over four years
- diversion vehicles unpicked
- 4diversion vehicles unpicked
01The situation
The investor put in the capital. The founder took his out, then kept going.
A strategic investor had committed substantial capital, through debt and equity, to a road-construction contractor. Soon after, the founder's personal circumstances changed visibly: luxury cars, a large home, overseas education for family. The investor, a minority shareholder without day-to-day control, asked us to trace where its money had gone.
How it came to us
After funding, the investor noticed transfers to the founder and his firm, and the founder's lifestyle changed sharply.
02How it worked
- 01The founder put in small seed advances, then withdrew them using the new shareholders' money, ending with a large stake at almost no net cost.
- 02A third-party bridge loan raised for an urgent material purchase was moved to his own account the same day and paid out to an individual. The lender was later repaid from investor funds.
- 03Recurring material-purchase payments were booked to the founder himself and then to his sole proprietorship, with little actually bought.
- 04Company loans to his partnership firm and to a contractor came straight back to his personal account the same day.
- 05The largest leg: security deposits paid to a genuine project sub-contractor were passed on the same day to his firm and then to him. Matching interest on the deposit was paid back in a circle to make the deposits look real.
- 06Some funds re-entered the company as director's advances, creating a liability he could draw on again. The proceeds went into property, investments, family transfers, cars and education.
Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram.
- The organisation
- Outside parties
- Insiders involved
- Where the money ended up
- Repeats / feeds back
How it was hidden
Money cycled among four vehicles. Deposit and interest entries looked commercially normal. A self-created director-loan balance masked withdrawals, transfers ran through several hops on the same day, and the firm's account was closed soon after. The same auditor and tax preparer served both the founder and the company.
03The challenge
Reconstruct four and a half years of company and personal money movements, much of it manual, without access to the founder's devices or his private firm's books, and separate genuine business payments from disguised withdrawals.
What made it hard
- 4.5 years of records, partly manual
- No access to the founder's devices or private books
- Multiple entities and family members
- Probable cash component in property deals
Red flags that were there to see
- Material purchases paid to a director
- Founder's stake with no net contribution
- Same-day matched inflows and outflows
- Deposits to a vendor larger than its business
- Inter-corporate deposits to stressed related parties
- Lifestyle jump against declared income
04Our approach
- Workstream 01
Records digitisation
Converted manual and fragmented records into an analysable ledger.
- Workstream 02
Funds-flow reconstruction
Traced company payments through every connected entity to final use.
- Workstream 03
Personal wealth analysis
Built a year-by-year view of the family's declared income against assets acquired.
- Workstream 04
Corporate and property records
Mapped entities, signatories and property holdings.
- Workstream 05
Market intelligence
Discreet enquiries on property values and related-party dealings.
- Workstream 06
Interviews
Put specific transactions to the people involved.
The breakthrough
Funds-flow reconstruction showed the 'security deposits' were routed back to the founder, with circular interest entries used to make them look genuine. The sub-contractor's own dealings were separated into genuine business and pass-through flows, and the founder later admitted a related kickback.
05What we found & did
- Seed capital was withdrawn, leaving no net founder contribution.
- A bridge loan was diverted on the day it was received.
- Material-purchase and loan payments were recycled to the founder.
- Security deposits to a sub-contractor were routed back to the founder.
- A kickback for steering inter-corporate deposits was received and admitted.
- Evidence pointed to company business being diverted to the founder's own firm.
- The sub-contractor's other dealings were confirmed as genuine business.
- Year 1
- US$18K
- Year 4
- US$5.9M
Lower bound of the end-of-period range
06The impact
The investor received a quantified, transaction-level account of the diversion and a map of the assets it funded, giving it the basis for negotiation and legal recourse as a minority shareholder.
- diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
- US$4.7M+diversion traced; ₹50 Cr+ including estimated cash
- investor funds under review
- US$24–35Minvestor funds under review
- family net worth over four years
- negligible → ₹50 Cr+family net worth over four years
- diversion vehicles unpicked
- 4diversion vehicles unpicked
07Lessons for your business
The controls that would have stopped this, or caught it sooner:
- Investor nominees should oversee how funds are deployed, not only board minutes.
- Prohibit payments to directors as suppliers.
- Bar auditors from personal engagements with promoters.
- Require board approval and related-party screening for inter-corporate deposits.
- Monitor same-day round trips and director advance balances.
~₹5 Crundue benefit quantified
The CEO's Three Vendors
A subsidiary CEO routed a rural retail rollout through vendors fronted by his own associates. The money trail led back to him.
- Procurement reconstruction
- Corporate and statutory records
- Ground intelligence
- Funds-flow tracing
~1Memails and documents reviewed
The Fortune That Wasn't There
Shareholders suspected their managing director of hiding a fortune. On the data available, the money trail did not support that suspicion, and it surfaced employee frauds instead.
- Digital forensics
- Source and application of funds
- Related-party mapping
- Market intelligence
14 yrsundisclosed vendor relationship
Fourteen Years on Both Sides
For fourteen years, the man who approved a manufacturer's transporters was also its transporter.
- Digital forensics
- Relationship mapping
- Financial review
- Asset searches
Client names and identifying details are withheld to protect confidentiality. Specific references and client experiences can be shared on request, with the client’s consent.
Confidential consultation
Facing challenges at work? Speak to us, and we can help you uncover the truth.
Every matter is different. Tell us what is happening and a senior expert will advise on next steps, in strict confidence.