Case study · Disputes
The Fortune That Wasn't There
Shareholders suspected their managing director of hiding a fortune. On the data available, the money trail did not support that suspicion, and it surfaced employee frauds instead.
- Disproportionate assets & unexplained wealth
- Sales, pricing & channel fraud
- Undisclosed conflict of interest
- Proxy, front & related-party vendors
- custodians examined
- 13custodians examined
- sources reconciled against applications
- ~US$3.4Msources reconciled against applications
- employee frauds established, plus one probable
- 2 + 1employee frauds established, plus one probable
- of promoter finances reconstructed
- 5 yrsof promoter finances reconstructed
01The situation
An investigation is not a verdict in search of evidence. Here the evidence pointed away from the suspect.
In a family-owned manufacturer, one promoter group suspected the managing director of taking cash on export deals, receiving vendor kickbacks and building undisclosed assets. There was no whistle-blower and no specific transaction to start from, and the managing director's own devices were out of reach.
How it came to us
A co-promoter believed the managing director was misusing his position and that his lifestyle and assets were out of proportion to his income.
02How it worked
- 01Allegation tested: cash benefits on overseas sales, returned through informal channels.
- 02Allegation tested: kickbacks from vendors through loyal employees.
- 03Allegation tested: farmhouse land and high-value interiors funded by undeclared cash.
- 04Pattern observed: the managing director set export prices personally, without documented approval, including cash discounts and invoices at prices different from those agreed.
- 05Pattern observed: older overseas sales passed through two or three related-party layers, each taking a commission.
Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram.
- Outside parties
- The organisation
- Channels & documents
- Where the money ended up
- Repeats / feeds back
How it was hidden
Senior authority overrode process, emails were sent from subordinates' accounts, offshore related parties shared directors, and alleged benefits were in cash or kind.
03The challenge
Test serious allegations against a promoter-level subject fairly, starting from nothing specific, and give the board a clear answer either way.
What made it hard
- Primary subject's devices unavailable
- No tip-off or transaction to start from
- Offshore entities and a cash economy
- Family group with overlapping directorships
Red flags that were there to see
- Promoter-level pricing without approvals
- Related-party commission layers overseas
- Tender registrations outside formal sales channels
- Company logistics used for a personal venture
04Our approach
- Workstream 01
Digital forensics
Imaged and reviewed 13 custodians' devices and mailboxes.
- Workstream 02
Source and application of funds
Reconstructed the managing director's income and outgoings across five years.
- Workstream 03
Related-party mapping
Traced entities and directorships across India and the overseas subsidiary.
- Workstream 04
Market intelligence
Three discreet field teams covering property, business interests and trade.
- Workstream 05
Pricing and sales review
Tested export pricing and order flows against six years of sales data.
The breakthrough
A source-and-application reconstruction covering most known statements showed the managing director's declared income broadly explained his assets, on the data available and without his own devices. That redirected the investigation to specific pricing and governance failures and surfaced employee-level frauds no one had suspected.
05What we found & did
- The managing director's assets were broadly explained by his declared income.
- No trace of offshore cash transfers was found.
- Export pricing, cash discounts and variant invoicing were controlled personally, outside approvals.
- Older overseas sales had passed through related-party layers taking commission.
- General governance and policy weaknesses under the managing director.
- Two employee frauds, an undisclosed vendor business and diversion of finished goods; a third probable.
- Sources
- US$3.4M
- Applications
- US$3.4M
Near-match: no disproportion on available data
06The impact
The board received a fact-based answer on its most serious suspicion, avoiding an unfounded accusation against a promoter, together with concrete governance fixes on pricing and related parties and three employee matters to act on.
- custodians examined
- 13custodians examined
- sources reconciled against applications
- ~US$3.4Msources reconciled against applications
- employee frauds established, plus one probable
- 2 + 1employee frauds established, plus one probable
- of promoter finances reconstructed
- 5 yrsof promoter finances reconstructed
07Lessons for your business
The controls that would have stopped this, or caught it sooner:
- Promoter pricing and discount authority needs documented approval and periodic review.
- Overseas related-party transactions need board disclosure and arm's-length evidence.
- Keep personal ventures out of company logistics and procurement.
- Preserve device access early in shareholder disputes.
~₹5 Crundue benefit quantified
The CEO's Three Vendors
A subsidiary CEO routed a rural retail rollout through vendors fronted by his own associates. The money trail led back to him.
- Procurement reconstruction
- Corporate and statutory records
- Ground intelligence
- Funds-flow tracing
US$4.7M+diversion traced to the founder
Zero Skin in the Game
An investor funded a road-construction contractor. Within months, the founder's own contribution had quietly gone to zero and the diversion had begun.
- Records digitisation
- Funds-flow reconstruction
- Personal wealth analysis
- Corporate and property records
14 yrsundisclosed vendor relationship
Fourteen Years on Both Sides
For fourteen years, the man who approved a manufacturer's transporters was also its transporter.
- Digital forensics
- Relationship mapping
- Financial review
- Asset searches
Client names and identifying details are withheld to protect confidentiality. Specific references and client experiences can be shared on request, with the client’s consent.
Confidential consultation
Facing challenges at work? Speak to us, and we can help you uncover the truth.
Every matter is different. Tell us what is happening and a senior expert will advise on next steps, in strict confidence.