Skip to content
Spectra Forensics, Investigation Specialist

Case study · Investigations

The CEO's Three Vendors

A subsidiary CEO routed a rural retail rollout through vendors fronted by his own associates. The money trail led back to him.

  • Undisclosed conflict of interest
  • Proxy, front & related-party vendors
  • Bid rigging & tender manipulation
  • Overbilling & inflated invoicing
  • Kickbacks
  • Fund siphoning & round-tripping
  • Evidence destruction
  • Vendor favouritism & share skew
contracts traced to front vendors
₹10–11 Crcontracts traced to front vendors
undue benefit quantified
~₹5 Crundue benefit quantified
mark-up on refurbished hardware sold as new
~3×mark-up on refurbished hardware sold as new
people and entities mapped
15+people and entities mapped

01The situation

Three vendors with no offices, no other customers and one common controller: the CEO who hired them.

A diversified group's agri-retail subsidiary was rolling out a network of rural franchise stores. Franchisees began complaining about the equipment and fit-outs they were receiving, and a management inquiry raised questions about the subsidiary CEO's outside interests. The group asked us to establish the facts.

How it came to us

Parent-group management raised concerns over the CEO's conflicts after franchisees complained about the quality of store fit-outs and IT kits.

02How it worked

  1. 01Before the new business line was approved, the CEO positioned loyalists. An internal IT employee left to run a dormant company, and the CEO's personal adviser joined it as a director weeks before approval.
  2. 02Days after board approval, that company received the combined IT and point-of-sale contract with no competing quotes. The subsidiary's existing, genuine IT suppliers were pushed down to become its sub-vendors.
  3. 03Refurbished hardware bought from those suppliers was invoiced to the subsidiary as new, at roughly three times cost, under bundled descriptions that defeated line-by-line comparison.
  4. 04A second associate's dormant one-person company won the multi-crore store fit-out contract despite negligible prior turnover. Its name and objects were changed only after signing, and the real fabricator became its sub-contractor.
  5. 05A third supplier, owned by a relative of a staff member, supplied store fixtures at about 75% above market. The staff member drafted its quotations herself.
  6. 06Payments were timed to the fronts' cash needs rather than the project plan, then moved through two to four hops labelled as temporary or hand loans before funding card bills, gold, property bookings and investments for the CEO and his allies.
How the scheme workedAnonymised
Subsidiary(CEO approves awards)Front vendors(associates as directors)Genuine suppliers(demoted to sub-vendors)Allied firms &individualsCEO andinner circleCards · gold ·property · investmentscontractsgoods at real cost'hand loans'2–4 hopsend usenext release

Swipe sideways to see the whole diagram.

  • The organisation
  • Outside parties
  • Cleared / genuine
  • Insiders involved
  • Where the money ended up
  • Repeats / feeds back

How it was hidden

Friends and relatives sat as directors and proprietors. Dormant companies were reused and renamed after award. Genuine suppliers were layered beneath the fronts, transfers were narrated as personal loans, and cash was deposited in small structured amounts. Forewarned months in advance, the CEO reset his laptop and mailbox content was purged.

03The challenge

Establish who really controlled the rollout's principal vendors, whether prices and supplies were genuine, where the contract money ended up, and which suppliers in the chain were legitimate, while working around a subject who had been forewarned and had cleaned his devices.

What made it hard

  • Subject forewarned; laptop reset and mailboxes purged
  • 10+ connected individuals and around 15 entities
  • Layering through many small transfers and cash
  • Rural sites and local-language records

Red flags that were there to see

  • Multi-crore award to a near-zero-turnover vendor
  • Vendor renamed after contract signing
  • Genuine suppliers demoted to sub-vendors
  • Staff member's relative on the vendor list
  • Vendor billing tax after its registration was cancelled
  • Payments released without goods receipt
  • Franchisee quality complaints left unresolved
  • Undisclosed directorship in a customer company

04Our approach

  1. Workstream 01

    Procurement reconstruction

    Rebuilt how each vendor was introduced, selected and paid, against the group's own sourcing rules.

  2. Workstream 02

    Corporate and statutory records

    Incorporation history, director changes, tax registrations and prior turnover of every counterparty.

  3. Workstream 03

    Ground intelligence

    Discreet verification of vendor premises, operations and true control.

  4. Workstream 04

    Funds-flow tracing

    Followed contract payments through allied firms and individuals to their end use.

  5. Workstream 05

    Price and supply verification

    Benchmarked supplied goods and rates against market sources and the genuine suppliers' own costs.

  6. Workstream 06

    Evidence recovery

    Rebuilt the record from bank trails and preserved communications where devices had been cleaned.

The breakthrough

Independent ground enquiries established that none of the three principal vendors had an operating premises; one was a residence. The suppliers beneath them were genuine businesses. Once that was clear, the money trail showed contract payments reaching the CEO's circle within days.

05What we found & did

  • The IT and point-of-sale vendor was a front controlled by the CEO, and refurbished hardware was sold to the company as new.
  • The fit-out contractor was a paper entity holding an inflated contract.
  • A fixtures supplier linked to a staff member charged inflated prices on documents she prepared.
  • Contract money was recycled into the CEO's personal investments.
  • The CEO held an undisclosed directorship in a customer company.
  • Evidence pointed to gold, property and cash being accumulated for the CEO.
  • The suppliers beneath the fronts were cleared: they were genuine operating businesses.
Point-of-sale kit: supplier cost vs price billed (indexed)
Supplier cost
100
Billed to company
290

Indicative, indexed to supplier cost = 100

06The impact

Management received an evidence-backed map of the arrangement: the fronts, the people behind them, the pricing gap and the end use of funds. It gave the group a basis for action against those involved, exit from the front vendors and recovery, and it cleared the genuine suppliers who had been drawn into the chain.

contracts traced to front vendors
₹10–11 Crcontracts traced to front vendors
undue benefit quantified
~₹5 Crundue benefit quantified
mark-up on refurbished hardware sold as new
~3×mark-up on refurbished hardware sold as new
people and entities mapped
15+people and entities mapped

07Lessons for your business

The controls that would have stopped this, or caught it sooner:

  • Competitive sourcing and vendor diligence must bind the CEO's own decisions.
  • Check a vendor's incorporation history and related-party links before the first award.
  • Reconcile vendor tax registrations against filings every month.
  • Keep payment release independent of the person who chose the vendor.
  • Secure devices and mailboxes before confronting senior subjects.

Confidential consultation

Facing challenges at work? Speak to us, and we can help you uncover the truth.

Every matter is different. Tell us what is happening and a senior expert will advise on next steps, in strict confidence.

Confidential enquiry